Tilt and Turn

I’ve just returned from a week in Colorado, where I took a workshop in European window making. The workshop is put on by a company called Rangate through their Alpine workshops Division. Rangate is headquartered in Vancouver B.C., with an office as well in Washington State. The workshop itself was hosted by Joe Calhoun at his shop in Ouray, Colorado.

Ouray, pronounced ‘yu-ray’ by the locals, is a stunning small town nestled in a Rocky Mountain trench. It’s located a couple of hours up a steep and windy mountain road from Durango in the south, and is one mountain ridge over to the east from the Telluride Ski resort. If you like vertical granite walls on all sides of you, Ouray is a beautiful place to spend some time. If you like riding trails in a Jeep, Ouray is without doubt the center of the universe for such activities. I’ve never seen more jeeps in one place before. In the winter, Ouray hosts a major ice climbing championship.

Joe Calhoun has been living in the area his whole life, and has operated a woodworking shop since 1976 or so. He initially had a shop space attached to the side of his house, but now houses his shop operations in a generous 40’x100′ metal building. Like me, he started out with relatively humble equipment, like Rockwell saws and planers, found them lacking for various reasons, and then gradually moved up the ladder to SCM, etc., and finally, after a particularly good run of years, to Martin. His shop is one of the sweetest I have come across, and if you like German heavy metal, what greets the eye is surely going to cause a certain amount of drooling.

He graciously allowed photos of his shop, so I thought I share a few highlights. Here’s his jointer planer combo in the nested configuration:

A Graule 170N radial saw:

Those Graule’s are just awesome saws. Heavy, solid, accurate – quintessential German equipment. These saws, despite their weight, are also taken to site by German carpenters.

A Maka oscillating horizontal mortiser with vertical drilling attachment:

He has two Martin shapers. This one shown below, a brand new T-12 with sliding table:

It’s very similar to my T-20 shaper, and it was interesting to see the various small changes that have been made to the new machine and its attachments. The feeder and its adjustment arm were pretty cool.

His older shaper is a tilting spindle T-27 with extension tables fitted to both sides and the large pull out support:

He also has a T-72 sliding table saw with the parallelogram miter fence, and I was excited to get a chance to play around with it a bit.

The big ticket item in Joe’s shop, however, was not a Martin and was not made in Germany. It is a Soukup window making machine made in the Czech Republic:

You’re looking at about $150,000 in the above photo. While it is a huge machine to my eyes, it is in fact the smallest model offered by Soukup. Essentially, it is a combination of shaper and tenoner. The shaper portion is found to the left of the operator, on the side which says ‘Crafter’, while the tenoner with a massive automated sliding table is on the right side. The operator spends most of their time at the front corner, near the touchscreen. A conveyor belt on the left allows for cut parts to be circulated back to the operator.

Tooling for European window making, especially when it involves tilt and turn windows, requires a lot of tooling. Here’s one side of one of his tooling racks, to give you an idea:


All the above tooling is made by Zuani, an Italian company. The tooling costs for making windows can quickly dwarf the cost of the shapers themselves. A basic tilt and turn window set of cutters starts at around $13,000 or so, and can climb to $40,000.

When you make windows, you often have to make dozens of them at a time, and having certain specialized piece of equipment can be most helpful to expedite production. Below is an assembly table with a built-in Omga miter saw:

The table has sliding pins – note the white plastic pins sticking up in the above picture. The pins register against the inside of the window sash unit, thereby setting a dimension. Once the sash is registered, there is a stop which is set to the correct distance for cutting the mitered bars that trap the glass in the sash. It makes it incredibly quick and easy to precisely miter cut those parts so they fit into the sash perfectly the first time.

Joe uses a Hoffmann MU2-P dovetailer to assembly the mitered frames. The dovetailer cuts a female dovetail slot crosswise down the face of the miter and after the two miter halves are glued and brought together,  a plastic or wooden butterfly key is hammered in to secure the parts together. I’d seen one in a picture before but it was great to have a chance to come across one directly and cut a few joints on it. It seems a logical solution for the joining of slender scantlings, especially when many parts must be cut and the completed frame is not subject to high stresses.

As for the course itself, I thought it was highly worthwhile. I am sometimes in the role of teacher in my life, and because of that also relish opportunities to be a student at times. For me, investing in my career means investing in not only tools and materials, but training. Woodworking is not a static field of endeavor. I’m an autodidact for the most part, but if there is a learning opportunity out there with someone clearly experienced in a thing I am just trying to get to grips with, then it seems worthwhile to go and visit them if the opportunity comes along.

The Alpine Workshops Tilt and Turn Window course costs around $2100 for 4 days, with accommodation, food and travel on top of that. Normally this window course is for 4 students, however 2 of them dropped out before we began, leaving only myself and a fellow named Steven from Utah. That meant we received about twice as much personal attention as otherwise, got to do more hands-on work, and, as we got through the material more quickly than a group of a larger size might manage, we had extra time at the end to delve into other material, most particularly shaper operations. Joe has almost all the Aigner gear for shapers, so it was great to be able to go through a bunch of different shaper operations using those specialized jigs and fences. I really felt like I got a lot out of my time there.

On top of the wood cutting and shaping – virtually the entire course was machine woodworking based – there was instruction in finishing work, which I hadn’t known ahead of time would be included. Getting the finish right on exterior doors and windows can save huge on expensive call backs due to failures in the finish. Also present for the course was Robert (Bob) Bein, a 3rd generation specialist in finishing from Long Island, New York. Another experienced finished from Colorado, Larry, was there to study under Bob, who was showing some new Italian finishing materials and methods from Sirca.

I’m no whiz as far as finishing work goes, and have tended to stay within an somewhat narrow range in my approach. I have seen other many woodworkers relying upon solvent-based, sprayed pre-cat lacquers, and the whole scene has not appealed to me in the slightest. I’m not willing to expose myself to toxic chemicals and fumes, or at least keep that to a minimum, and the finishes produced by those methods have always seemed a bit plastic-y to me.

What Bob was demonstrating during the workshop however was quite different than what I had come across previously. For starters, these products were water-based, and were applied in a manner which was quite counter-intuitive to anyone who has applied more conventional finishes. The first thing he showed was a three-step system for exterior woodwork. First the wooden assembly, a small window frame in this case, was literally showered in a priming material called an ‘impregnator’. This did not, as the name might suggest, lead to the window having, ah, little window offspring, but rather it is a liquid which soaks into the wood and provides an anti-bacterial/anti-microbial treatment. The wood is dunked/soaked in this liquid and hung up to dry almost like laundry, with any drips soaked up with a sponge.

After the impregnator has dried, about half a day later, the base coat is applied. The base coat is a water-based viscous liquid that is sprayed with a slightly modified spray gun. The spray gun holds a clear plastic pot which contains the base coat loaded into a plastic bag. A separate air line runs to the pot and pressurizes it. The coating comes out of the spray gun partly by suction and partly by back pressure. What’s interesting about the base coat is that it is applied very heavily – so heavily that most other types of coatings there would be runs. However this base coat is ‘thixotropic’ , which means that it is a gel which becomes a liquid as it is sprayed and is able to cling tenaciously to vertical surfaces without running as it returns to a gel. It dries hard from there in about a day. Bob applied the base coat to a 14 mil. thickness.

The next day, the base coat was dry, and through a cross-linking process chemically, was stretching tight and quite even. We then gave it a light hand sand with 320 grit paper and I was surprised that the finish didn’t clog the paper at all and was very easy to flatten.

Then came the top coat, also a single application, and a resin which was even more viscous than the base coat. It was applied in a similar manner to the base coat, also to a 12~14mil. thickness.

The above describes a film-forming coating, which makes sense on doors and windows, and carries a 5 year warranty from the maker. It was a really simple process to follow and fairly goof-proof if you ask me.

For finishes which are ‘closer to the wood’, Sirca also offers an alternative type of impregnator which contains wax that is strongly hydro-repellent. Somehow they have found a way to combine way and water. It is easy to apply this waxy impregnator with a rag, then wipe it off after a few moments. When dry it provides a nice feel of the wood, and a satin sheen. As an exterior finish it would need to be reapplied yearly, a task which is easy to do as it only requires that one clean the wood and then brush on another coat over top of the previous.

I feel like I learned heaps during the course, and as a result feel much more confident about working with my shaper. I also met some great people and enjoyed my time with them. As for making windows, I have a much better understanding of European type windows, including Passive Haus windows.

If I were to describe the key difference between a European window or door – and by that I essentially mean a German type of window – and an American one, the German approach to the window could be easily summed up by this picture:

German door and window construction features stepped interfaces where multiple levels of weather stripping can be applied. The weather stripping itself is quite sophisticated in form. These windows have significantly higher insulation value, especially when using triple-pane glass, and are superior in terms of sound insulation as well.

A picture of a German type of tilt-turn window frame shows this idea quite well I think:

As you can see, the corners connect with an open mortise and tenon, or bridle joint if you prefer. The sticks themselves are generally laminates of three pieces.

A cross section shows the vault-like interface between sash and frame in this type of window assembly:

We also looked at lamination and construction strategies for exterior doors during the course, and different approaches to tenoning on the shaper. We covered a lot of ground I thought, definitely exceeding my expectations in that regard.

As to whether I’ll get into making windows on any significant scale, I’m not sure I’ll go that route anytime soon. At least I have a clearer idea now of what is involved, process- and equipment-wise, so that is something which has been gained, and I think that I would want to put European type windows on the next building project I’m involved with, if they apply to the situation. Windows are a major architectural component, especially these days, a significant portion of the entire thermal efficiency picture for a building, and are a major cost in the construction. Think of the energy saved across the country, particularly in northern regions, if the majority of houses had decent window thermal performance.

All for now, thanks for your visit. Comments always welcome.

10 Replies to “Tilt and Turn”

  1. Jack,

    oh yeah, he still has that, and I omitted to take a picture. In the picture of the Graule saw, it is way in the background, obscured mostly by the 14″ bandsaw.


  2. Based on a 34 inch wide door. What's the cost of a oak door. Also a 20×30 window. I'm not trying to be a smartass but looking at cost vs US cost. We tend to buy cheap in this area of the country.

  3. Rootertooter,

    the kind of doors and windows made in Joe's shop are generally not intended for the low end of the market, which is, as you know, served admirably well by any number of large factories which crank out lower cost goods in volume. Americans tend to buy cheap in nearly all areas of the country, I might add. Those looking for cheap doors and windows will undoubtedly look elsewhere than a small shop producing quality goods.


  4. Chris, in the archives of your blog is your very nice question that came up after touring Starret's ancient factory and looking at the frozen Northfield. I would like to add my .02 cents from what I have been thinking over….

    THE BEST book to get me thinking was this one by Steven Johnson, Where good ideas come from.


    his chapter on the adjacent possible is so good- I have read it over and over.

    Here is an important summary of that idea…

    At the core of his alternative history is the notion of the “adjacent possible”, one of those ideas that seems, at first, like common sense, then gradually reveals itself as an entirely new way of looking at almost everything. Coined by the biologist Stuart Kauffman, it refers to the fact that at any given time – in science and technology, but perhaps also in culture and politics – only certain kinds of next steps are feasible. “The history of cultural progress,” Johnson writes, “is, almost without exception, a story of one door leading to another door, exploring the palace one room at a time.”

    Think of playing chess: at any point in the game, several ingenious moves may be possible, but countless others won't be. Likewise with inventions: the printing press was only possible – and perhaps only thinkable – once moveable type, paper and ink all existed. YouTube, when it was launched in 2005, was a brilliant idea; had it been launched in 1995, before broadband and cheap video cameras were widespread, it would have been a terrible one. Or take culture: to 1950s viewers, Johnson argues, complex TV shows such as Lost or The Wire would have been borderline incomprehensible, like some kind of avant-garde art, because certain ways of engaging with the medium hadn't yet been learned. And all this applies, too, to the most basic innovation: life itself. At some point, back in the primordial soup, a bunch of fatty acids gave rise to a cell membrane, which made possible the simplest organisms, and so on. What those acids couldn't do was spontaneously form into a fish, or a mouse: it wasn't part of their adjacent possible.

    There IS no adjacent possible for Northfield anymore, because the coral reef of heavy machine design for industry has has mostly died here?. Compare that to say the evolution of the mobile device where it is a seamless blend of hardware and software design, of all kinds of sensors and algorithms and apps that are the bits and pieces, the adjacent possible is a very rich coral reef of life in silicon valley and the rewards both financial and personal are so great that the migration of our talent is there………..?

    Since you know so much about Martin I have one Q that you might be able to answer. I was drawing up a list for the dream work shop and read much of your blog material. Byrd shelix heads seem to be changing many older machines and giving them a new lease on life.. Felder has their silent power and it sounds good on youtube. Martin does not offer a segmented cutting head on their machines? Do I have this right? Is this a not invented here reason,or no need. Or just the adjacent possible at work with a division in the evolution of the machine? I would only have Martin at the top, but am wanting to see a Felder Format with the silent power head?

    I think I want a Martin, but with a Shelix, or SIlent power type head, is that possible?

    Thanks in advance for your thoughts( as you know more than most)

    PS What a treasure trove of material I found in your blog. Thanks for the work on it as it helps searchers like me.

  5. Jon,

    a most worthy and chewable comment – thanks for taking the time to share!

    I'll take a look at that piece by Steven Johnson – always looking for fresh perspectives on this issue, and I appreciate the lead.

    As for Martin, yes, they offer a helical insert head – Byrd Shelix – as an option on their planers and jointers, at least here in the US.

    I'm not convinced though about the noise issue – standard Tersa heads are fairly quiet as the knife projection from the cutter block is slight and thus they don't beat the air like conventional knife systems. I can run both my planer and jointer without hearing protection, no problem. It's actually the dust collector in my shop that makes the most noise, and requires earplugs.


  6. I can't believe you chose this topic at this time! A builder that I have worked with for about 25yrs and I were just talking about the windows in the USA and in Europe. He and I have replaced 100s of windows (with mostly Pella and Windsor) over the years. We have both been to Europe and have compared the windows we saw there to the windows here. While I have liked the quality of the windows I have installed (for the most part) I was very impressed with the windows I saw in many of buildings in Paris. My wife may have thought I was nuts to spend vacation time visiting several window stores there. Unfortunately there are few houses being built (there are some) that deserve windows of this caliber. I toured the Windsor factory in Iowa and felt they did have the ability to produce some very good windows – if the customer allowed the upgrades. I'm jealous as I would love to have taken that class.


  7. Paul,

    happy to hear that the above post timed well with your circumstances and experiences. I hope you get a chance to take the course in Colorado sometime! Thanks for the comment.


  8. A very interesting article. I like tilt-turn windows.

    While tilt-turn windows are very common on new construction here in the Netherlands, I must say I've never actually seen a wooden one. Most of them seem to consist out of plastic extrusions or fiberglass pulltrusions, both with metal parts for the mechanism inside. In new construction these seem to be the norm today since they don't require maintenance over their lifetime.

    Most of these windows have double seals like the cross-section of the Soukup windows that's in the article. The tilt-turn windows in my flat have holes in the bottom of the frame to let out the water that would otherwise run in when the window is tilted. I guess that's what the elaborate plastic skirting on the Soukup window is for? But wouldn't that prevent the window from turning?

    One thing to keep in mind if you ever use these kinds of windows; while my tilt-turn windows can be locked in different positions when tilting (it's complicated to explain, I can send pictures if you're interested), there is nothing to lock the window in a position when it's turned! I tend to put wedges between the window and the windowsill, but that's in improvisation. On older (outward-opening) wooden windows there is always a window stay. That is something I really miss.

    With regards to finishing, I don't think one should be too scared of the toxicity of finishing materials. But it is my impression that in the USA generally more is allowed than in Europe. But even in Europe the most common restriction is “for professional use only”. When taking the necessary precautions, these materials can be handled safely. And “natural” materials can be just as dangerous. Look e.g. at the strong contact dermatitis that urushiol (from the Chinese lacquer tree or poison ivy, poison oak) can produce.

    Since wood can also can contain sensitizing and toxic substances, an insufficient or malfunctioning dust collection should probably be of a greater concern for a woodworker.

    Additionally, “water-borne” does not mean solvent-free! Commercial wood coatings will usually still contain volatile organic chemicals (in the range of 240 g/L to 700 g/L). And presumably some extra stuff to make it form a dispersion in water.

  9. Roland,

    I greatly appreciate the comment.

    probably it is true that more is allowed in the US than Europe in regards to allowable limits of solvent and other toxic finishing agents, however it is not always the case. Take diesel emission standards, which are far stricter in the US than elsewhere.

    I'm happy to use a finish that dries quickly and does not smell gross.


Anything to add?

error: Content is protected !!
%d bloggers like this: